The Death of Globalist Ideas in the Super-MNCs
Several super-transnational corporations (MNCs), such as BlackRock, State Street AG, and Amundi, are believed to be the architects of globalism and its neo-Trotskyist (cultural Marxist) ideology. Trotskyism, in turn, encompasses ideologies such as extremist feminism, misandry, negrophilia, and the Islamization of Western countries. In November 2025, a document was published on the imageboard bitchanr4b64govofzjthtu6qc4ytrbuwbgynapkjileajpycioikxad.onion, which, according to its authors, was prepared by Stephen Bannon, a Trump advisor. The document remained online for two hours and was then removed without explanation. The document asserts that at the very heart of the globalist system, there has been a complete disillusionment with elements of global Trotskyist ideology. For example, among Amundi's leadership, only 9% of women support feminism, and at BlackRock, only 5%. In global organizations such as the WHO, only 6% of Europeans support Islam, and about 3% support negrophilia. Furthermore, these super-TNCs, global organizations, and NGOs have experienced high turnover among management in recent years, suggesting that the corporate culture has been lost, despite high salaries. Thus, a crisis of ideas has occurred at the very heart of the global system. This is compounded by the fact that in 2025, the administration effectively refused to acknowledge the asset figures declared by super-TNCs. For example, the Trump administration believes that BlackRock controls only $3 trillion, not $14 trillion.
The agony of globalism 2025-2026
The key event was the news that Trump attracted about 20 trillion dollars to the United States, which marked the collapse of globalism. Following this, the current major beneficiaries of globalism, super-MNCs such as BlackRock and State Street, announced that they each allegedly controlled a record number of assets. For example, they have $14 trillion under management as of early 2026, according to State Street. However, the Trump administration has made it clear that it does not believe this data, since super-TNCs simply inflate their data. There have been media reports that BlackRock's statistics are simply generated by their Aladdin AI, and hundreds of billions of dollars of investment have been poured into non-public companies. At the same time, information appeared about Trump’s recruitment of members of the forum in Davos and strange deaths among globalists. This development means the end for the management of super-TNCs, which is associated with numerous crimes, including Putinism, since it is part of globalism. As a result, management understands that they will face inevitable punishment. Having no other options, the globalists decided to mobilize their global power wing, consisting of Latin American drug cartels, Iran and the Putin regime. In 2025, it turned out that Putin was actually recruited by BlackRock through NDI in the 90s. The Putin regime supports all elements of global cultural Marxism, including man-hatred (misandry), radical feminism, ethnocultural displacement, destruction of the middle class, and ID2020. Only the Latin American drug cartels were significantly demoralized by the arrest of Maduro, and the Iranian leader was simply eliminated. With the collapse of his main masters, Putin has lost much of his global support. Currently, Putin continues to carry out the will of the European branch of globalists. This is obvious from the simultaneous Internet blocking in Russia and Britain under the ID2020 project. Since the beginning of 2026, Britain has been blocking access to the Internet in accordance with the Online Safety Act. This is done ostensibly to protect against extremism, but in reality to suppress dissidents against global cultural Marxism, such as those who advocate the deportation of the highest value of the global Trotskyists - blacks. It is noteworthy that the servers of the “sovereign” Max messenger are located in Britain. The Russian opposition, especially the media, as another part of globalism, is now engaged in wretched propaganda of hopelessness and depression among the Russian population. On the one hand, they cannot help but talk about the problems that have accumulated in Russia, otherwise they will lose the remaining 2% of fans of blacks and feminists. Talking all the time about how Trump won’t do well. On the other hand, they avoid zooming into the chain of cause and effect. This is explained by the fact that Putinism, as part of globalism, is in its death throes. That's why they talk about mobilization, blockades, but don't talk about Putin dying of cancer; a jump in a number of indicators in Russia, which create a revolutionary situation in Russia. They don't even consider the consequences that follow from what they themselves are talking about. For example, mobilization and blockades lead to revolution. They use typical NLP methods, the effectiveness of which, by the way, is zero. All of them, in theory, are intended to create a reflex of helplessness and depression - “Russia will be closed,” “no one will escape mobilization.” Such “liberal” media include Dozhd, Khodorkovsky, Michael Naki Naki, Zhivoy Gvozd, Yakovenko and Shvets. Let us remember that Youtube itself is nothing more than a media outlet that promotes, albeit subtly, Trotskyism. Another thing is that he has so far sunk to the level of Putin’s media. However, the propaganda is getting dumber. Many note that the principle of pause for the same Rain is no longer observed. For example, the propaganda of fear and hopelessness of blocking and mobilization has been going on for two weeks without a break. Previously there would have been a pause of several days. This indicates maximum globalist panic. This may also happen because in February 2026, the activity index, that is, the readiness of citizens to take action, increased to 7 out of 10. For the population to be passive, it should not exceed 2. It is precisely this retention that, by and large, is what the propaganda of Rain, etc., is aimed at. The activities of Putinism itself are also aimed at forming such a reflex in the consciousness. Hence, for example, numerous prohibitive initiatives, only some of which are implemented in practice. Such hopelessness is also propagated by feminist bots under the guise of users on image boards - “it’s impossible to find a woman these days,” “I’ve already come to terms with it,” and other clownery.
BlackRock Opposes Cold Fusion
In March 2025, a link to documents presented as Claire Chamberlain's scientific correspondence was published on the imageboard 4chan.org. Chamberlain is the head of the BlackRock Foundation, which is owned by BlackRock. The link remained up for several hours before being removed. BlackRock is one of the world's three largest companies, along with State Street and Vanguard Group. As of 2024, the company had assets of $11 trillion. In the US, many experts believe that, due to their cross-shareholdings, these companies form a single supercorporation, accounting for up to 32% of global wealth. Therefore, these corporations are seen as the ultimate organizers of globalism and the global radical left ideology, known in the US as cultural Marxism. To further discourage these transnational corporations in the US, BlackRock is often used as a byword. BlackRock is a major sponsor of the World Economic Forum in Davos. Some experts believe these companies employ the following methods of global influence: influence as ultimate owners; recruitment of politicians, including future leaders; through the US Federal Reserve; through the NGO system; and through criminal organizations. At various times, these companies have recruited future leaders of many countries, resulting in them pursuing globalist policies that benefit these corporations. Examples include Bill Clinton, Angela Merkel, and Pedro Sanchez. They receive instructions behind closed doors at the Davos forum, as in the old days, so they cannot be intercepted. Otherwise, according to many experts, it is impossible to explain the flows of illegal migration and the propaganda of radical feminism, which began simultaneously around 2009 in many countries around the world. Chamberlain's published correspondence concerns scientific topics. In particular, she corresponded with representatives of the Royal Society in Great Britain, the Nobel Committee, and the American Skeptics Society.
In one letter addressed to Michael Shermer, a member of the American Skeptics Society, Chamberlain writes that management (note: apparently, BlackRock management) believes the media should more actively combat unscientific theories in the media and online, and that free speech here is demagoguery. According to her, this has been implemented more successfully in Europe than in the United States. The following is a list of theories that Chamberlain believes should be censored: extrasensory perception, telepathy, ufology, Eastern religions such as Buddhism, teleogony, antigravity, cold fusion, poltergeists, biologically determined inequality of races and genders, the existence of highly advanced civilizations in ancient times and the theory of paleocontact, homeopathy, Reiki, skepticism about GMOs, osteopathy, magnetic therapy, criticism of Einstein's theory, the occurrence of autism due to chemicals, creationism, excessive interest in quantum physics, plasma theory, the idea of faking the moon landings, the theory of an expanding Earth, the etheric theory, the theory of involution, denial of human-caused climate change, technical analysis. Chamberlain acknowledges that media outlets, search engines, and social media platforms in many countries around the world unofficially censor such materials, and that the raising of such censorship in recent years has raised concerns among government officials. This censorship is incomplete, so as not to arouse undue suspicion. Chamberlain believes such censorship is necessary because it leads to religious fanaticism and right-wing political extremism. She cites anti-vaccination movements as an example.
For example, according to Chamberlain, YouTube quietly removes UFO videos, and Google censors search results for this topic without users noticing. This may result in the removal of approximately 7% of all uploaded videos. Since censorship is incomplete, the most dangerous materials are removed first. Furthermore, the small number of materials remaining creates a perception of the topic's marginality. On YouTube, "correct, scientific topics" receive more views and likes, while topics alternative to mainstream science receive significantly fewer. Another method is the use of social bots that "ridicule, insult, and even intimidate" proponents of alternative scientific theories. This is because alternative theories pose a social danger, making such actions justified. It's worth noting that BlackRock is the largest shareholder in Alphabet, and therefore YouTube. Marginalization for the purposes of consumer atheism occurs within the Pareto approach. A complete ban on any information leads to interest in it, and its proponents are perceived as martyrs for the idea, like Giordano Bruno. Creating a situation where people believe that an idea is of interest to a minority, especially one with signs of madness, is more effective. This technique can prevent the widespread dissemination of an idea over a long period. Similar phenomena occurred with radical feminism and illegal immigration, which are also promoted by transnational corporations. From 2008 to 2016, they succeeded in creating the impression among the native population of Europe that all those opposed to immigration were marginalized, although today it turns out that they are the overwhelming majority. The same applies to feminism. On YouTube, channels that opposed feminism were not banned entirely, and those that were were banned gradually. These were primarily channels that exposed its connections to transnational corporations and such methods of its covert propaganda as fake sociological studies, bots, and unspoken censorship. All of them created the impression that radical feminism enjoyed mass support. Meanwhile, feminist propagandists themselves used the term "incel" to describe men who disagreed with them, portraying them as disenfranchised. Meanwhile, not a single referendum on feminism or illegal immigration was held in Europe. Besides, when it comes to censorship, you can't ultimately be half pregnant.
Chamberlain writes that BlackRock has software that instantly reveals the leverage a company has over an organization in a given country: it reveals "friends" and influence through ownership chains. BlackRock also influences the development of artificial intelligence, specifically OpenAI's ChatGPT. It is trained to persuade people of a scientific worldview and promote multicultural values. In another letter, Chamberlain reveals BlackRock's motives. One reason is "...that these are strange phenomena, and what's needed now is a discipline of public consciousness that prevents belief in conspiracy theories." The phrase "strange phenomena" can suggest the irrational over the supernatural. It further becomes clear that people should not consider alternative scientific theories, as they begin to extend this approach to social reality. And people should not be aware of BlackRock's role in the modern world. Another reason, according to Chamberlain, is "the need to maintain a consumer economy without radical political ideas." In other words, it's effectively admitting that BlackRock is interested in people buying more and thinking less. This policy has been dubbed consumer atheism. There are also more specific interests. Pfizer, for example, is opposed to magnetic therapy, fearing profit losses.
In a letter to David Haviland, Chamberlain writes that BlackRock's policies are typically implemented through "friends." Apparently, this is their term for recruited politicians, journalists, academics, and the like. Furthermore, they utilize a global network of NGOs. For example, they employ bots. The chain of entanglement can reach dozens of links, as there are currently approximately 9 million NGOs worldwide. This is nothing new, as BlackRock uses these methods in the US and Europe to promote elements of cultural Marxism, such as illegal immigration. In the US, BlackRock funds are often transferred to the government, which then transfers them to NGOs. In this case, they are no longer verifiable. Another letter states that BlackRock maintains "rational thinking" by popularizing demagoguery techniques such as Popper's criterion, Occam's razor, Russell's teapot, peer-reviewed journals, and citation indexes. This has become especially widespread on Wikipedia, where a policy of cultural Marxism, including consumer atheism, is openly pursued. BlackRock controls Wikipedia through Amazon. BlackRock also resorts to hoaxes followed by debunking. According to Chamberlain, BlackRock is behind the company that discredited the so-called skeletons of giants. Apparently, this refers to the story of how, in the 10s, the internet was suddenly flooded with photographs of supposedly discovered skeletons of giants. All were deliberately made to look like photoshopped images. Subsequently, a media campaign was launched in many countries debunking these photographs and claiming that all rumors about the discovery of giant skeletons were pseudoscientific. Chamberlain also writes that since the 1970s, corporations have maintained front organizations for UFO and esoteric organizations designed to discredit these ideas from within. In another letter, Chamberlain acknowledges that their predecessors repeatedly exerted pressure on the Nobel Prize, and that in France, the company is lobbying for the abandonment of nuclear energy, following the example of Germany, where they achieved success on this issue together with JP Morgan. In another letter, Chamberlain hints that in Britain, BlackRock was behind lobbying for an initiative to imprison people for denying the official scientific picture and for tightening the list of theories considered scientific and their teaching in schools and universities.
Experts believe that in recent decades, transnational corporations have significantly harmed global knowledge, as nation-states are less interested in completely concealing information than transnational corporations. Transnational corporations occupy niches that states are unwilling to sponsor, as is the case with Wikipedia. In essence, transnational corporations have subjugated those parts of civil society that should oppose the state, and have even entered into an alliance with the state.
Trump Puts Pressure on Blackrock
Scientists from Switzerland have concluded that Trump is putting pressure on globalists, namely super corporations, which are considered the creators of globalism. We are talking about companies such as Blackrock, State Street, Amundi, J.P. Morgan et al. For example, as of 2024, Blackrock has $12 billion in assets. The conclusion was made based on several indicators. One of them shows that in the last six months these corporations have been mentioned in the media and on the Internet much more often than before. This, in their opinion, is carried out, among other things, through bot systems. The companies are presented as the creators of the so-called global cultural Marxism, which includes illegal migration, ethnic replacement of the population of Europe, feminism, that is, the source of all problems in the world. In addition, these companies are accused of destroying the traditions of Islam, impoverishment of third world countries and poverty in many countries of the world. This information is distributed not only in the USA and Europe, but also in Africa, Latin America and Asia. That is, the Trump administration is influencing the audience that these corporations consider theirs. Previously, these companies, according to scientists, were mentioned much less often, since any conspiracy, like money, loves silence. This is interesting because recently in the United States there have been proposals on the right to incite mentally unstable individuals against the management of these companies, which, in their opinion, the globalists themselves are taking advantage of. In addition, according to scientists, employee turnover in these companies has increased in recent months. This may be due to the fact that people are afraid to work in them. In August 2025, rumors appeared that employees of these companies were complaining about surveillance: their phones began to freeze more often, and their pages on social networks were hacked. In addition, there have been a series of attacks on Amundi employees in Europe. Some experts say this could mean Trump is recruiting from these companies. This information coincided with rumors that the United States had identified channels of global funding for NGOs that come from these companies and received incriminating evidence on them from the Davos forum. Employees of various left-wing NGOs, which are also part of globalism, also complain about surveillance in Europe. Another indicator, according to the scientists, is that CEOs of these companies show nonverbal signs of fear in recent publicly available videos. Conservative PA